![]() ![]() ![]() I'm quite sure Cubase is better for that. I lived with that while I was doing mostly audio projects, but now I want to get deep into MIDI stuff. I'm presently on Studio One but can't get past how it doesn't create a mixer channel for external instruments and apparently never will. Therefore I am much faster working in Samplitude.Thanks for that. But the main differences I have 14 years experience working with Samplitude compared to Cubase which I only open occasionally. Samplitude has extensive metering and Comparisonics wave colours which I find very useful plus the object editor is very flexible. However there are things I miss compared to Samplitude. It's very well integrated and thought out. Regarding my feelings I think Cubase 10 is very good and has some useful features that Samplitude doesn't have like the arranger track and chord tracks to mention two. I had a friend who wanted to work on a project in Cubase so I was doing a crash course so I could work on it for him. It was an easy call to upgrade when I saw these changes.įor any Samplitude fans out there, Pro X4 is worth a look. Samplitude has always had great functionality, and it's nice to see an update that makes substantial improvements to the interface. I haven't played with that part a lot yet, but it looks like a step up. They now have "automation lanes" which is a really nice implementation.įourth, the MIDI interface is a improved. Third, there's a very nice interface for automation curves, which was another sore point in the past. The old menu system was a bit of a hassle, and they've really done a nice job with the plugin browser in X4. Second, it has much improved plugin organization through the new plugin browser. It's nice to see Samplitude allowing users to take advantage of the available hardware. ![]() Previously, it struggled with more than 14. Samplitude was already a very strong DAW, but the new release has come a long way with respect to some of the areas where Samplitude needed some help.įirst, it now supports up to 36 cores/threads. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |